nb:michaud_c._levesque_1980_canlii_3140_nb_ca
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| nb:michaud_c._levesque_1980_canlii_3140_nb_ca [2026/08/29 00:32] – created victorzhou | nb:michaud_c._levesque_1980_canlii_3140_nb_ca [2026/08/29 07:42] (current) – victorzhou | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | 8 I am not convinced that the legal principles given in these decisions can be applied in this case. The evidence clearly shows that the appellant had no knowledge of the sump pump and no reason to suspect there was one. I gave the reasons for such a conclusion in the summary of facts. Additionally, | + | 8 I am not convinced that the legal principles given in these decisions can be applied in this case. The evidence clearly shows that the appellant had no knowledge of the sump pump and no reason to suspect there was one. I gave the reasons for such a conclusion in the summary of facts. Additionally, |
| + | |||
| + | 9 The appeal is allowed with costs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Appeal allowed.// | ||
nb/michaud_c._levesque_1980_canlii_3140_nb_ca.1787963576.txt.gz · Last modified: by victorzhou
